Jet engine turbine blades are made from nickel-based superalloys like Inconel, which need to balance high-temperature strength against oxidation resistance. Working with a hypothetical Ni-16Cr-3.4Al alloy under a fixed solution (1050°C) and aging (800°C) heat-treatment cycle, the brief was to use CALPHAD-based computational thermodynamics to model the alloy's microstructure and optimize its aluminium and chromium content against competing performance objectives.
My Role
This was an individual project: I ran all the Thermo-Calc modeling, derived the property models linking simulated phase data to strength and oxidation resistance, wrote the MATLAB optimization scripts, and authored the full technical report.
Engineering Highlights
CALPHAD modeling: Used Thermo-Calc (NIDEMO thermodynamic database) to compute phase equilibria, mapping how the strengthening γ′ (Ni₃Al) precipitate phase fraction varies with both aging temperature and alloy composition.
Aging temperature analysis: Quantified the strength-temperature relationship, showing that lowering the aging temperature from 800°C to 450°C increased the precipitate strengthening contribution from 231 MPa to 590 MPa — and explained why 800°C is still the practical choice.
Multi-objective optimization: Built a normalized performance index in MATLAB combining strength and oxidation resistance from Thermo-Calc-derived equilibrium data, identifying the Al concentration that best balances the two competing properties.
Two-variable optimization: Extended the model to jointly vary Al and Cr, using grid heat maps and phase diagrams to find a composition that maximizes strength while respecting phase-stability and precipitate-fraction constraints.
Trade-off analysis: Evaluated the interplay between strength, oxidation resistance, and alloy density (via the rule of mixtures) for aerospace weight considerations.
Results
231 → 590 MPa
strengthening gain, 800°C → 450°C aging
4.16 wt% Al
optimal balance of strength & oxidation resistance
Ni–16.05Cr–5.4Al
max-strength composition (fppt ≤ 0.5)
Phase fraction vs. aging temperature — sets the feasible aging windowPhase fraction vs. Al content at the aging temperaturePerformance index vs. Al content — optimum at 4.16 wt%Precipitate fraction across Al/Cr composition spaceFeasible single-phase region at the solution treatment temperature
Individual project completed as part of MCEN90014: Materials Engineering, University of Melbourne.